 |
|
 |
i am cyclist, hear me rawr |
 |
|
Do you bike? |
yes |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
no |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total Votes : 16 |
|
Author |
Message |
PO Info |
 |
ScrumYummy bunnyhunches of scrums

Gender:  Joined: 29 Jun 2005 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:48 am Post subject: i am cyclist, hear me rawr |
So I posted this on my journals, aaaaand I like it and I think people should read it, so I'm sharing it on the forums I'm on. enjoy =)
i am cyclist, hear me rawr
So I took up cycling a few months ago, and have since been gradually getting more and more involved on the scene. In fact, I am to the point where I would rather ride a bike than drive a car; I don't even own a car, and my main source of transportation is my bike. I lurve my bike. It has become an extension of myself.
That being said...I have a few requests from people that drive cars. Warning: the following contains some rantage.
1. Do NOT honk at bikers, even if you know them and are saying "hi." The sound is deafening to us, and we assume that you are just being an ass. Also, if you honk because you're afraid that a biker is going to come out in front of you, well, get this--we have more control over our vehicles than you do over yours. So shut your trap.
2. Do NOT yell things out of your window. Again, even if it's something friendly, it still sounds threatening to someone on a bike. And in either case, we usually ignore it, so don't bother.
3. Do not throw things out of your window. Do I really have to explain this one? Didn't think so.
4. Let us decide how close is "too close." You don't have to go twenty feet out of your way to go around us, but at the same time, don't try to drive us off the road or nudge us with your car. Again, we have more control over our vehicles than you do over yours, so let us worry about what we are doing, and you can go back to talking on your cellphones or doing your make-up.
5. A BIKE IS A VEHICLE. This means that (in regards to traffic laws) you treat it like any other vehicle on the road. Don't cut of bikers. Do NOT overtake a bike at a stop sign (not only is that illegal, it's very dangerous for both driver and cyclist). If a bike is in the lane in front of you and you can't go around due to oncoming traffic, suck it up--don't honk, or yell, or throw things at us. It's not our fault you can't go around.
6. Check your mirrors, DAMNIT. A bike will always be coming up on your right (unless making a left turn), so always check your right and rear-view mirrors when making a right turn. I've nearly been hit twice (in the three months I've been cycling) by retards that weren't looking (and when this happens, I reserve the right to slap the hood of your car when I am riding by).
7. Check traffic before opening your doors. I shouldn't really have to say this, it's a no-brainer. But when you are parallel-parked on the side of the road, check behind you before you open your car door; an opening door can be very bad news for a biker. And I reserve the right to slam it shut if I am biking by and you almost door me.
8. SIGNAL YOUR TURNS. I shouldn't have to say this, either. But so many people don't, and it's really dangerous for us. >.>
Most of the things I mentioned are either common sense or GENERAL TRAFFIC LAWS, so while you might think I'm just being a whiney biker, realize that while you may know better, SO MANY PEOPLE DON'T. And most of the things I mentioned can mean serious injury or even death to a cyclist. So, yeah, I wrote up all of that because I'm tired of it happening to me, and while I know that the people who really need to read that never will, it still feels good to get it out somewhere.
Anyway. Urban group biking is so much fun! I love it muchly. : : And no matter how much shoyt I have to put up with, I'm still going to bike. So there.
Oh yeah! as for what I ride, I have a road/mountain hybrid (leaning more towards the "mountain" side, with upright/straightbar handles and tread wheels), a Trek 4300. It works really well for where I currently live, although I plan on one day (in the future, when I have that mythical thing called "money" once again ;_; ) on getting a nice road bike with drop-bars. I also want a hybrid-frame fixy with bullhorn handles, but the road bike takes priority.
Max and Selena have recovered antique road bikes from Josh's parents' garage and are fixing them up in our living room. There are parts and dirt everywhere, it's awesome !
*****
Oh yeah, after I posted this in my journal, I got this reply from a friend on DA (reposting it to show that I wasn't exaggerating in any of that):
RabidBenAffleck wrote: | lol amen to the bike rants. I ride my bike fairly often. (Well, usually. It's actually bent beyond recognition after an .. incident with a driver who hit me with his damn car)
Yea.. I get hit a lot. I think I've been hit 7 times in the last 3 years. All of those times were, thankfully, at low speeds so no severe injuries. And all but one were people not using blinkers then going all the sudden to turn into a side street without noticing me right there.. Pleasant.
People really are dicks to bikers, it's rather unsettling. |
Not to mention, my friend Selena was hit by a woman that was making a right turn and wasn't looking. Thankfully Selena was fine, and a few other cyclists (who were in a car) witnessed the accident and came to her aid, but that still didn't keep the woman from blaming the accident on her and making the police believe it was Selena's fault. And Selena tried to get them to file a report, but they wouldn't. >.> |
_________________ -Scrum-
..it borked. :D
Last edited by ScrumYummy on Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 23 - Losses 22 Level 7 |
EXP: 2313 HP: 2241
 |
STR: 779 END: 731 ACC: 795 AGI: 795
|
Totem Doll (Sword) (320 - 360) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doot Cute and Non-Abrasive Hyper Hypo

Gender:  Joined: 15 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:56 am Post subject: |
My complaint of the whole thing being a motorist in a biker area and actually just a general question then.
If a bike is a vehicle and has to obey the laws of the road that every motorist has to obey, how is it that they can cut to the front of the lines at lights (thus forcing any motorist who has already passed them to have to pass them again AND how is it that many of the cyclist I've seen can run red lights/stop signs?
I'm all for sharing the road but I see a ton of double standards on the road when it comes to cyclists. |
_________________
Doot vanishes fast. "Is it wind that makes that sound?" "No. It is your doom."
"Makai shotto!" (Yeah, I'm sexy ain't I!) |  |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 60 - Losses 60 Level 11 |
EXP: 7293 HP: 2500
 |
STR: 800 END: 850 ACC: 920 AGI: 930
|
Dark Blade of Miniopia (Blades) (360 - 440) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RivaOni Full English!

Age: 41 Gender:  Joined: 24 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:34 am Post subject: |
All the above applies to motorcyclists too!
I dont agree with byciclists running red lights Doot, but I dont see the issue behind them going to the front of a queue at lights, if you spot a gap in a lane thats going the same way as you are, and you're in a car, that gaps far enough in front to be an advanage to you, do you take it? of course you do, bikes have the advantage of being able to take up less space therefore they can take those smaller gaps.
In motorcycle lessons, you're also encouraged to do so, a motorcycle accelerates much quicker than an average car,so your encouraged to go to the front to avoid the possibility of being cut up by a car user and being knocked off your bike. Likewise, a bcyicle is slower than a car so you're encouraged to go to the front so all car drivers are aware of you're presence. Its a safety first thing, besides, a road isn't a race circuit, doesnt matter what order your in or how many times you have to take over somebody and its much easier to overtake something as small as a bycicle or motorcycle |
_________________
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 27 - Losses 14 Level 8 |
EXP: 6250 HP: 2275
 |
STR: 895 END: 690 ACC: 810 AGI: 805
|
Blue Beam Saber (Sabers) (325 - 385) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doot Cute and Non-Abrasive Hyper Hypo

Gender:  Joined: 15 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:13 am Post subject: |
The cyclists running up the queue would be those that - when seeing a line of cars waiting for a light - ride to the right of them (near the curb) and poise themselves at the front of the line.
I understand it's not a race - but a motorist would not do that without getting fined and if we indeed want equal road rights for cyclists of any form, then they should adhere to the same rules. |
_________________
Doot vanishes fast. "Is it wind that makes that sound?" "No. It is your doom."
"Makai shotto!" (Yeah, I'm sexy ain't I!) |  |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 60 - Losses 60 Level 11 |
EXP: 7293 HP: 2500
 |
STR: 800 END: 850 ACC: 920 AGI: 930
|
Dark Blade of Miniopia (Blades) (360 - 440) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ScrumYummy bunnyhunches of scrums

Gender:  Joined: 29 Jun 2005 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
I will admit that there is a double-standard when it comes to traffic laws and cycling. But when you consider the fact that in any accident, the cyclist is probably going to be the only casualty, it's almost fair. The majority of accidents aren't even the cyclist's fault--they come from when a driver isn't using their signals, or just doesn't see the cyclist when the cyclist is following all traffic laws.
Another problem is that there are very few states that have any actual laws for biking. Most states only have two--cyclists must have headlights and backlights at night, and a bicycle is to be considered a vehicle. So it's common sense for us to follow traffic laws, but most people aren't aware of biking laws, and the laws that do exist are so vague that you can almost argue either side for it.
Cutting to the front at a red light is not only done for safety reasons, but a cyclist accelerates much slower than a car, so if we waited in line, we'd still be pissing off the people behind us. *EDIT* And not by law in most places, but generally speaking, a biker is supposed to always stay to the right of traffic unless making a left.
As for running stop signs/red lights, most of us only do it if there are no cars around, or (when at a stop sign) there are people behind us, nobody at the other stops, and it just makes sense to go. Several occassions that I have stopped at stop signs, the car behind me overtakes me, which to me seems more dangerous than running the stop-sign when there isn't any traffic.
We also do it because of physics. We can slow down and make sure that there isn't any traffic coming without losing much momentum, wheras if we stopped at every single sign/light we would have to rebuild all of the momentum we had. So while if there is traffic at the other stops, or traffic at lights, I always stop, but if there's nobody there, I go (except at red lights, which will usually give me a green or somebody in a car will come up behind me and set of the sensor). |
_________________ -Scrum-
..it borked. :D |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 23 - Losses 22 Level 7 |
EXP: 2313 HP: 2241
 |
STR: 779 END: 731 ACC: 795 AGI: 795
|
Totem Doll (Sword) (320 - 360) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ming DOOM!

Gender:  Joined: 13 Jan 2003 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:56 am Post subject: |
Ok, I feel like spreading the seeds of dissention, so bear with me. I have a general notice to all the "cyclists" out there:
YOU ARE NOT A CAR
Now, I know that that may come as a surprise to you, but I assure you that it's the truth.
All sarcasm aside, I respect bikers. My dad was a very big fan of cycling and got fairly into cycling before he got sick. And my brother, Tobias, is very much into cycling as well. And I am saddened to hear when cyclists get hit by cars, but I can tell you that, given the way I see some people conduct themselves on a bike, I'm not surprised.
If you weave in and out of traffic (which I have seen done MANY times) then YOU are wrong. If cars are so dangerous to you, then stay away from them. The town that I live in has bike lanes. Use them.
Also, I'm tired of "cyclists" being arrogant pricks. Like it or not, that guy's post is arrogant. If you don't like the sound of car horns honking, then get off the road. And if a car honks at you because they think that they might hit you, odds are you are doing something to cause that worry. And because of the backward laws that we have, the car will always be at fault, even when the biker is clearly wrong. Cars have horns to alert others of danger, deal with it.
I had an experience with a "cyclist" once. I was pulling out of an underground parking lot in Manhattan. The "cyclist" is standing at the end of the driveway, on the sidewalk. He looks at me and says (in a nasty tone), "Turn on your lights. I can't see you." First of all, I JUST pulled out of the UNDERGROUND parking lot. When I got into my car, I did not know that it was STARTING to get dark. Excuse me for not being quick enough to turn on my lights, which didn't even HAVE to be on yet.
Let's get something straight, don't tell me how to drive my car. Just because you're on a bike because you can't afford a car doesn't mean you can take your aggression out on me. I obey the rules of the road, and I even respect you arrogant bikers. And don't, under any circumstance, DARE touch my car unless it is a dire emergency. If you have so much control over your "vehicle", and you have time enough to shut my door (since you came up on me without warning), then you had time enough to avoid my door.
Finally, you may notice that I keep referring to bikers as "cyclists", and you may be wondering why I keep doing that. Well, the reason is this:
YOU ARE NOT LANCE ARMSTRONG
No matter how much you try to be, or try to pretend to be, you're not, and you never will be. Nor will you ever be any other kind of REAL cyclist. Why? Because they don't complain about all the "evil oppressive drivers". Because they repect the cars on the road. Because they respect that fact that they are a mere insignificant minnow in a sea of giant 2000 pound colossi. And because they understand that the road belongs just as much to cars (in fact more) than it belongs to bikes, and they know how to share, and not be a greedy jackass. |
_________________ Spinning around and being graceful looks cool, but then someone comes along and cuts something off, and the fight is over.
Official UP lover!
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 41 - Losses 44 Level 10 |
EXP: 5223 HP: 2300
 |
STR: 900 END: 700 ACC: 1000 AGI: 800
|
Equitas (Sword) (385 - 385) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FawkesFyre Saving the World, one Kitty at a Time

Age: 46 Gender:  Joined: 28 Sep 2006 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: |
This has been in interesting and kinda fun thread...
I'll be honest and say that as a motorist, I'm not too fond of cyclists. I'm afraid of them. I'm one of those who swerve way out of the way because I don't want to hit them, and I don't trust that one moment I pass next to them is not the one and only time they lose control and hit me.
I support the idea that a bicycle is a "vehicle" and has to abide by road rules but their lack of speed makes for a more dangerous situation on the road. That's the part that I really don't understand. Roads have a speed limit where slower traffic keep to the right but cyclists go WAY slower than a car. The slower traffic cars have to pass any cyclists to keep from getting run over by the traffic behind them.
I wish they would allow cyclists to ride on the sidewalks. It would make for a much safer situation for everybody. They'd get to use the same direct routes as cars, but are safely out of reach from the motorists. |
_________________
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 65 - Losses 76 Level 16 |
EXP: 4304 HP: 3233
 |
STR: 1087 END: 1073 ACC: 985 AGI: 855
|
The Fyresaw of Fiery Feathered Fury (F^4) (Saw) (225 - 725) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ming DOOM!

Gender:  Joined: 13 Jan 2003 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:39 pm Post subject: |
FawkesFyre wrote: | I wish they would allow cyclists to ride on the sidewalks. It would make for a much safer situation for everybody. They'd get to use the same direct routes as cars, but are safely out of reach from the motorists. |
The problem with that is that the roles reverse, or better yet reassign themselves. The bicycles become like the cars and the pedestrians become like the bicycles. Then the people in cars are happy because they don't have to worry about bicycles, but the pedestrians are unhappy because now they do. And the bicyclists are unhappy because they just like to complain.
 |
_________________ Spinning around and being graceful looks cool, but then someone comes along and cuts something off, and the fight is over.
Official UP lover!
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 41 - Losses 44 Level 10 |
EXP: 5223 HP: 2300
 |
STR: 900 END: 700 ACC: 1000 AGI: 800
|
Equitas (Sword) (385 - 385) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ScrumYummy bunnyhunches of scrums

Gender:  Joined: 29 Jun 2005 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:53 pm Post subject: |
Ming wrote: | Ok, I feel like spreading the seeds of dissention, so bear with me. I have a general notice to all the "cyclists" out there:
YOU ARE NOT A CAR
Now, I know that that may come as a surprise to you, but I assure you that it's the truth.
|
No shit, sherlock. ! The point of the article wasn't that "bikes = cars," it was that bikes should be respected and given space on the road (preferably bike lanes) and that most people aren't aware of (or choose not to follow) basic traffic laws.
Ming wrote: |
All sarcasm aside, I respect bikers. My dad was a very big fan of cycling and got fairly into cycling before he got sick. And my brother, Tobias, is very much into cycling as well. And I am saddened to hear when cyclists get hit by cars, but I can tell you that, given the way I see some people conduct themselves on a bike, I'm not surprised.
|
Good to hear. And while the majority of us try to follow the law or just keep to ourselves on our bikes, unfortunately there are a lot of asshat bikers out there that set bad examples.
Ming wrote: |
If you weave in and out of traffic (which I have seen done MANY times) then YOU are wrong. If cars are so dangerous to you, then stay away from them. The town that I live in has bike lanes. Use them.
|
I completely agree. Just as a car shouldn't weave in and out of traffic, neither should a bike (although a lot of bike messengers do this because they make money based on how quickly they can get a package/document somewhere--not that it makes it right).
And I would totally use bike lanes, if the city I lived in had them. There are groups here trying to get them in, but it's still very low on the city's list of priorities, sadly.
Ming wrote: |
Also, I'm tired of "cyclists" being arrogant pricks. Like it or not, that guy's post is arrogant. If you don't like the sound of car horns honking, then get off the road. And if a car honks at you because they think that they might hit you, odds are you are doing something to cause that worry. And because of the backward laws that we have, the car will always be at fault, even when the biker is clearly wrong. Cars have horns to alert others of danger, deal with it.
|
Um. Ming.
I wrote that. X)!
I wasn't being arrogant--I was writing about how people in general have a tendancy to ignore general traffic laws. I wasn't saying that all motorists are dumb pricks that don't know how to drive, but appearantly enough of them are that they don't use their signals, they don't look where they're going, and they give me problems on a regular basis and I have to be proactive in my responses by assuming that a car is going to turn even when they aren't signaling. The way I have managed to avoid being hit so far is by making eye contact with people and making sure they see me, but sometimes it seems people are driving too fast and still not paying attention (like the two times I have nearly been hit).
And a lot of people honk because they can't tell their ass from their foreheads. There have been SO MANY times that I have been biking along, minding my own business, as far right as possible so that drivers can go around me (there are no bike lanes here, so I just stay to the right side of the road unless making a left turn) and a car will come up behind me and lay on their horn as they drive by. Now, I fully understand the reason why horns exist and recommend their use for that purpose (alerting people of danger), but not for endangering a biker so that you can have shits and giggles.
Ming wrote: |
I had an experience with a "cyclist" once. I was pulling out of an underground parking lot in Manhattan. The "cyclist" is standing at the end of the driveway, on the sidewalk. He looks at me and says (in a nasty tone), "Turn on your lights. I can't see you." First of all, I JUST pulled out of the UNDERGROUND parking lot. When I got into my car, I did not know that it was STARTING to get dark. Excuse me for not being quick enough to turn on my lights, which didn't even HAVE to be on yet.
|
That biker was an asshat. And I'm not even going to try to make excuses for someone else's behavior, but a lot of bikers take the (albeit politically incorrect) approach of "the best defense is a good offense" to interacting with motorists. My friends and I try to be as indifferent as possible to motorists--we ignore it when they honk or yell or throw things at us, we follow traffic laws, and we basically keep to ourselves and just bike. I will admit, though, that I have slapped cars that nearly hit me, but it was more of a way of saying "WATCH WHERE YOU ARE GOING" than trying to be an asshole.
Ming wrote: |
Let's get something straight, don't tell me how to drive my car.
|
I'm not telling you how to drive your car. The LAW tells you how to drive your car. I'm just asking people to follow it.
Ming wrote: |
Just because you're on a bike because you can't afford a car doesn't mean you can take your aggression out on me.
|
I think it's safe to say that the majority of bikers bike because they enjoy it, not because we're "poor." I have spent nearly $1000 on my bike and gear, which I could have easily spent on a car (even a shibby one), but I chose not to. We do it because we enjoy it, we love it, not because we're broke.
We chose this lifestyle. And we understand that it means that we are at a disadvantage. But we wouldn't be in as much of one if people would follow the law.
Ming wrote: |
I obey the rules of the road, and I even respect you arrogant bikers. And don't, under any circumstance, DARE touch my car unless it is a dire emergency. If you have so much control over your "vehicle", and you have time enough to shut my door (since you came up on me without warning), then you had time enough to avoid my door.
|
Good for you. I'm glad to hear that you follow the law. Unfortunately, a large number of people don't, and those people are putting my life in danger. (And, really, their lives and the lives of other motorists, too.)
Honestly, I don't touch people's cars unless it's absolutely necessary. And no, avoiding doors as opposed to shutting them is not a good idea. It would mean having to merge left suddenly into the traffic behind you and has the potential to cause an accident (and really, it happens so fast that shutting the door is a reactionary impulse). Again, not doing it to be an asshole, but rather to protect myself from being knocked into traffic.
Ming wrote: |
Finally, you may notice that I keep referring to bikers as "cyclists", and you may be wondering why I keep doing that. Well, the reason is this:
YOU ARE NOT LANCE ARMSTRONG
No matter how much you try to be, or try to pretend to be, you're not, and you never will be. Nor will you ever be any other kind of REAL cyclist. Why? Because they don't complain about all the "evil oppressive drivers". Because they repect the cars on the road. Because they respect that fact that they are a mere insignificant minnow in a sea of giant 2000 pound colossi. And because they understand that the road belongs just as much to cars (in fact more) than it belongs to bikes, and they know how to share, and not be a greedy jackass. |
Okay, the reason why I used bikers and cyclists interchangeably was because when I use the word "biker," people respond that it makes them think of Hell's Angels @_____@ so I use "cyclists" around people that don't bike and "biker" among those that do, and interchangeably here so that people would know what I meant.
And no, I don't think I am Lance flippin' Armstrong, f#$% that noise. I wasn't complaining about "evil opressive drivers," I was complaining about people that break the law. And I understand that a car is a 2000 pound colossi with the potential to kill me, most bikers do (which is why a good many of us refer to cars as "death machines") and I FULLY RESPECT their right to the road and stay to the right, but saying they have more right to the road than bikers do is like saying a larger person has more right to the sidewalk than a smaller person, or that an 18-wheeler has more right to the road than a car. The truth is, we all have equal rights, but we have to learn (and by "we," I mean bikers too) how to treat each other with respect and follow the law.
FawkesFyre wrote: |
I'll be honest and say that as a motorist, I'm not too fond of cyclists. I'm afraid of them. I'm one of those who swerve way out of the way because I don't want to hit them, and I don't trust that one moment I pass next to them is not the one and only time they lose control and hit me.
|
Most of us are paying more attention to you than you realize, so as long as you don't drive right into us, we'll be fine.
FawkesFyre wrote: |
I support the idea that a bicycle is a "vehicle" and has to abide by road rules but their lack of speed makes for a more dangerous situation on the road. That's the part that I really don't understand. Roads have a speed limit where slower traffic keep to the right but cyclists go WAY slower than a car. The slower traffic cars have to pass any cyclists to keep from getting run over by the traffic behind them.
I wish they would allow cyclists to ride on the sidewalks. It would make for a much safer situation for everybody. They'd get to use the same direct routes as cars, but are safely out of reach from the motorists. |
Ideally, all cities would have bike lanes and bikes can keep to their lanes and cars to theirs. But realistically, a good number of cities don't even have sidewalks (believe it or not, the one I currently live in--of 60,000 people--does not have sidewalks).
And biking on the sidewalk is dangerous for pedestrians. So that rules out that idea.
Ming wrote: | And the bicyclists are unhappy because they just like to complain.
|
If motorists would just leave me alone, then I wouldn't have anything to complain about  |
_________________ -Scrum-
..it borked. :D |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 23 - Losses 22 Level 7 |
EXP: 2313 HP: 2241
 |
STR: 779 END: 731 ACC: 795 AGI: 795
|
Totem Doll (Sword) (320 - 360) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FawkesFyre Saving the World, one Kitty at a Time

Age: 46 Gender:  Joined: 28 Sep 2006 |
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: |
Ming wrote: | FawkesFyre wrote: | I wish they would allow cyclists to ride on the sidewalks. It would make for a much safer situation for everybody. They'd get to use the same direct routes as cars, but are safely out of reach from the motorists. |
The problem with that is that the roles reverse, or better yet reassign themselves. The bicycles become like the cars and the pedestrians become like the bicycles. Then the people in cars are happy because they don't have to worry about bicycles, but the pedestrians are unhappy because now they do. And the bicyclists are unhappy because they just like to complain.
 |
If the bicycles become cars to those pedestrains, maybe they can take out some of those J-walkers
I really like this thread...this has been fun to read. And as evil as it sounds, have you all noticed that all the ppl that bike or referenced that bike have a running tally of how many near misses they've had w/ cars? I've needed a good smile and laugh today. The death machines are going to eat you! Mwahaha
Yes, yes, I know there's actually nothing funny about it and I certainly wouldn't want to have that happen to me IRL but still. I have this cartoon going through my head of these man-eating cars chasing after cyclists trying to eat them... |
_________________
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 65 - Losses 76 Level 16 |
EXP: 4304 HP: 3233
 |
STR: 1087 END: 1073 ACC: 985 AGI: 855
|
The Fyresaw of Fiery Feathered Fury (F^4) (Saw) (225 - 725) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|