 |
       |
User CP
:: Log in to check your private messages
:: Chat
:: Register
:: Log in

Board Index
:: Album
:: FAQ
:: Calendar
:: Members
:: Groups
:: Staff
:: Search
|
 |
|
 |
RPGs and that Dreaded Control System |
 |
|
Author |
Message |
PO Info |
 |
Shurikane Dim Panties As String

Joined: 24 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:55 pm Post subject: RPGs and that Dreaded Control System |
I've played enough RPGs to know that there are tons of valid ways to control your characters:
-Random encounters (Final Fantasy, Phantasy Star, Golden Sun, Breath of Fire)
-Point-and-click (Diablo, Lineage)
-Action-RPG (Phantasy Star Online)
-Platform-RPG (Legend of Zelda, Castlevania, Wonder Boy)
-Shooter-style WASD (GunZ Online)
I'm also thinking about the complexity of the controls, ranging from the overly simplistic two-action layout of Diablo II, to the more refined customizable buttons of Phantasy Star Online, and to the immense shortcut menus of Lineage II and World of Warcraft.
My own RPG concept involves swordfighting, throwing, and gunning, which means I have no choice but to adopt either an over-the-shoulder third-person perspective or a first-person perspective (or a mix of the two), and the concept itself draws on the Platform-RPG style, which doesn't arbitrarily decide upon hits or misses with the roll of a dice. Anyway. That means I need to map four keys to basic movement, and optionally the mouse for looking around. That's all fine and dandy.
But now, what about the skills and shotcuts? My concept has tons of skills, magic spells and whatnot. I originally planned to have the whole keyboard be mappable to the user's will but then I thought, maybe that would be overkill... Also, there are RPGs that build their strategy specifically on the fact that there are very few shortcut slots available (such as Diablo II and Guild Wars.)
So that's my question to the rest of the gamers: how much keyboard would you be willing to deal with? Just the F keys? The number keys? The numeric keypad? Left and right mouse buttons? The whole keyboard? Would you prefer to have many mappable keys or do you find it beneficial to purposely restrict the number of mappable keys? |
_________________ Gopher it.
"Remember when /b/ was good?"
"/b/ was never good." |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 24 - Losses 32 Level 8 |
EXP: 2375 HP: 2550
 |
STR: 1050 END: 750 ACC: 800 AGI: 600
|
Graduate's Windbuster (Sword) (230 - 480) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Silver Adept Otaku Lord

Age: 42 Gender:  Joined: 20 May 2003 |
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 6:13 pm Post subject: |
It depends on the macro ability of those keys. If there's good macros that can be made out of it, then lots of keys being mappable is good. If not, then the design needs to centre around being able to access all of the skill keys easily in the middle of a firefight. |
_________________ Sir Silver Adept, KCI. Check out the Knights of Jubal if you want to revive chivalrous behavior.
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 293 - Losses 240 Level 23 |
EXP: 2163 HP: 3375
 |
STR: 1125 END: 1125 ACC: 1225 AGI: 1225
|
Sander's Asylum (Partisan) (505 - 655) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MitchellTF Senior Otaku
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 |
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:58 pm Post subject: |
All I know, is that controlling via Keys works much better than via Mouse, because it encourages Zelda-Style dodging and running, more than just trading blows...(Maple Story rocks for this...)
Other than that, not much else to say... |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 1 - Losses 0 Level 2 |
EXP: 0 HP: 1850
 |
STR: 750 END: 550 ACC: 550 AGI: 750
|
Slashy the Sword (Sword) (230 - 300) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|