Judge vetos proposed videogame law...YAY!!!

[Razer]

from Gamespot.com-

"Illinois game laws overturned
District Judge rules that regulations would have violated First Amendment right of free speech.

The game industry scored a victory on Friday when US District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly declared a pair of Illinois game restriction laws unconstitutional, Game Politics reported.

The Violent Video Games Law and the Sexually Explicit Video Games Law (SEVGL), introduced last December by Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia (D-Aurora), were set to go into effect January 1, 2006. Had they stood, the laws would have limited the sale and/or rental of games with violent and sexually explicit content. Retailers caught renting or selling such games to persons 18 or under would have been fined up to $1,000 for violating the statute.

The Illinois Retail Merchants Association joined the Entertainment Software Association and the Video Software Dealers Association as a co-plaintiff in the suit, which was filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

In a 53-page ruling, Judge Kennelly defended games as a protected form of free speech, dismissed the state's scientific evidence suggesting causal links between violent games and violent behavior. He called the wording of the laws unconstitutionally vague. In particular, he took the Sexually Explicit Video Games Law to task for parroting the language of traditional obscenity laws, but omitting key parts that ensure a work's merit as a whole be taken into consideration when determining its legality. He specifically brought up the recently released action title God of War, and mentioned the title's mini-game in which main character Kratos has implied sexual relations with two women.

"Because of this one scene, a game such as God of War, which essentially parallels a classic book like The Odyssey, likely would be prohibited for minors under the SEVGL, because the statute allows a game to be regulated based on one scene without regard to the value of the game as a whole. Such a sweeping regulation on speech--even sexually explicit speech--is unconstitutional even if aimed at protecting minors."

Last month a Michigan law imposing restrictions on the sale of violent games to minors was temporarily blocked. A pending California gaming law set to go into effect January 1, 2006 has also precipitated a lawsuit from the ESA and the VSDA, but no ruling has been made in that case as of yet.

In other game legislation news, New York Senator Hillary Clinton said she will introduce federal legislation to restrict the sale of violent games to minors when Congress next reconvenes. "


Could there be one sane person in politics? I shudder to think this logicalness might become a trend.

Oh, and Hillary Clinton is still a b--ch.

[Girkon]

Well it's heartening to know that there is some logic and sanity in the justice system.

[Kothar_Isk]

I bet you that Judge is a gamer!

[MitchellTF]

I get a warm fuzzy feeling when Judges rule in our favor...now to play GTA: Vice City, GTA: 3, and Halo...

Next game, they should make bodies stashable...(That's not a dead hooker in my trunk...)

[Razer]

[Nogrick]

Just like it is with porn. Except you can't sell porn to a minor.

[MitchellTF]

One of Jack Thompson's 'sane' points, is that we should MAYBE add the penalty...Which is ironic, since that was this law...And the judges he wanted to take his side didn't...

Which means either he's crazy, or the rest of the planet is...(Jack Thompson goes from sane, to insane, and back to sane...)