 |
|
 |
Outrage from an Online Quiz?! |
 |
|
Author |
Message |
PO Info |
 |
Ming DOOM!

Gender:  Joined: 13 Jan 2003 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 2:12 pm Post subject: |
Blackmage wrote: | I want to know how many people checked world domination besdies me. |
I checked world domination.
Did you guys happen to notice on this test that one of the statements was if you ever cheated on a test...or a lover. Ummm...aren't they like, completely different things? While we all already pretty much discounted this thing as sheer idiocy, I just found this funny. |
_________________ Spinning around and being graceful looks cool, but then someone comes along and cuts something off, and the fight is over.
Official UP lover!
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 41 - Losses 44 Level 10 |
EXP: 5223 HP: 2300
 |
STR: 900 END: 700 ACC: 1000 AGI: 800
|
Equitas (Sword) (385 - 385) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Graillik Tur Renaissancetaku

Gender:  Joined: 09 Jul 2004 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 2:19 pm Post subject: |
I know this is gonna sound retarded but I think as the question is stated you are supposed to believe in your own God, whatever that maybe. It has be proven by psychologists that those that believe in some sort of diety tend to be nicer and more moral than those that don't. Also, if you have a specific religion in mind, you already refer to your diety as "God" just as the Natives do with Wakantanka. It's all relative to your beliefs. But I do find it funny that in a mostly Anglo-Christian society, that when you see god capitolized, you automatically think of the Christian god. If you were to do that in a middle-eastern country, it would be Allah, so it's all relative to your own state of mind.
Oh...and I had to go look it up cause I never really stopped to think about what religion is so...
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
now by that deffinition....there are a lot of things that could be a religion...even OCD could be a religion under those terms (#5). So I put this to you as kind of skirting the issue and please don't get into this to deeply...what does religion mean to you? Don't wanna know what you believe, don't wanna no what you practice, don't wanna argue about right or wrong, just what is your belief on the morallity of humans, the afterlife, the creation of man and the world, stuff like that, I guess a better statement would be "core beliefs" to use a military term. So what are they? After a few if it stays nice I might tell mine. |
_________________ It is my firm belief that in this era of mass connectivity, the death of us all will be mass media.
Why do we insist in believing we are masters of our surroundings when we fail so miserably to master ourselves?
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 2 - Losses 10 Level 3 |
EXP: 283 HP: 1950
 |
STR: 750 END: 600 ACC: 750 AGI: 600
|
Shotbow (Shotgun) (240 - 320) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Akanari Owns your reality

Gender:  Joined: 29 Sep 2004 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 3:44 pm Post subject: |
First of all, I'm not letting an online quiz get to me. I'm not -that- testy. I was more reminded of encounters through the online quiz...Perhaps I should change the topic title. Perhaps not.
This might be long...
The God I was referring to is Anglo-Saxon in nature, though I think it applies to most Gods. Also, I find the sort of close-mindedness I'm ranting about more prevelant in monotheistic religions. (I am not considering Hinduism a monotheistic religion at the moment, despite the one powerful God with all its manifestations)
Ming wrote: | This brings up an interesting question...if you don't believe in some sort of higher power, then do you really believe in good and evil? I mean, if you don't have some higher power to impress, then what's the point? Aren't the terms "good" and "evil" derived from the teachings of such higher powers?
|
Well I've never heard that before. That theory would involve a completely extrinsic set of morals which (I don't mean to be rude if it comes off that way) I find the most repelling portion of most religions! I mean, isn't that almost turning into a psychologically disabling co-dependent relationship when your behavior is changed to "impress?" Good and evil are just rules that a higher power sets up?
Haven't you all learned to challenge authority? ;D I kid, I kid. But, I don't know, I've just never felt comfortable with taking my directions from above or below. I take them from within.
Getting into psychology...I'm sure some of you are familiar with Freud's id, ego, and super-ego. Are you saying a super-ego, a mind's conscience, cannot exist without a external higher being (or law, I assume)?
More later.... |
_________________
Our freedom is consuming itself,
What we will become is contrary to what we want
Take a bow. |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 46 - Losses 45 Level 10 |
EXP: 5098 HP: 2225
 |
STR: 775 END: 725 ACC: 925 AGI: 975
|
Crown of Thorns (Partisan) (305 - 465) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ming DOOM!

Gender:  Joined: 13 Jan 2003 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:29 pm Post subject: |
Akanari wrote: | Getting into psychology...I'm sure some of you are familiar with Freud's id, ego, and super-ego. Are you saying a super-ego, a mind's conscience, cannot exist without a external higher being (or law, I assume)? |
What I was getting at is to me, it seems as if most morality is derived from some sort of belief system, generally involving some sort of higher power. Without that belief system, then what determines what is morally correct or incorrect, or what is "good" or "evil"? Each belief systems creates some sort of moral code which, when followed, derives some sort of spiritual reward. In Christian religions when you're "good" you get to go to Heaven. In Buddhism, when you're "good" you get reborn as a higher life form until you escape your cyclical existence (Samsara) and achieve spiritual enlightenment (Nirvana).
But when you take away the belief system, you lose that moral code and spiritual reward, so what's to determine what's good or evil anymore?
I'm not arguing, I'm just trying to spark conversation because it's been a while since the last time I had a philosophical discussion. |
_________________ Spinning around and being graceful looks cool, but then someone comes along and cuts something off, and the fight is over.
Official UP lover!
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 41 - Losses 44 Level 10 |
EXP: 5223 HP: 2300
 |
STR: 900 END: 700 ACC: 1000 AGI: 800
|
Equitas (Sword) (385 - 385) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Graillik Tur Renaissancetaku

Gender:  Joined: 09 Jul 2004 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
Ming is right. With out the belief of a higher influence, what ever it may be, you can not set standards for action. Example. Karma dictates that the better your behavior, i.e., creating an envirornment that is condusive to the human collective, you will be visited back on with good, i.e., beneficial, things. If you do not believe that something other than man influences the enviroment around you, you can not set a standardized ideal of right and wrong. And as for Freud...man was a loose cannon to begin with. Anyone that says not pooping enough as a child can lead to homosexual tendencies or that not being breastfed and make you homicidal is not exactly the man I would bring to a party. I mean the man believed that all things were based on the preconcious instincts we have nurtured since the dawn of time. I...don't agree with Freud. A lot of nice theories, but not exactly practical in practice. Even so...the idea of the id being the uncontrolled urges of self gratification means that they are there for some reason. Now...if we say it is biology that has made us this way, biology is the higher power. Whatever instills the id is the higher power. Man can not create by design his own id, it has to come from somewhere else. Therefore, no without a higher system of order the preconcious can not exist. If you believe Freud that is. |
_________________ It is my firm belief that in this era of mass connectivity, the death of us all will be mass media.
Why do we insist in believing we are masters of our surroundings when we fail so miserably to master ourselves?
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 2 - Losses 10 Level 3 |
EXP: 283 HP: 1950
 |
STR: 750 END: 600 ACC: 750 AGI: 600
|
Shotbow (Shotgun) (240 - 320) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tobias *explodes*

Age: 38 Gender:  Joined: 17 Jan 2003 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 5:05 pm Post subject: |
Ming is very right indeed. Good and evil is something that is brought about by religion, which Grallik produced in his earlier post, is partially a set of written code and rules.
What I have to add to this for the moment, before i start delving any further, which will contradict what i just said: Right and wrong is developed by society.
My argument for that: Religion is created by man to explain the unknown. If that's the case, then man creates the rules that religion creates: therefore, rules are created by man, as is right and wrong.
as far as that quiz - that's this gents' business and beliefs. I don't think he's right. In fact, i think he's quite stupid...but i am 52% evil  |
_________________ I am not afraid to die today
Nor afraid of what Death will bring.
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 112 - Losses 110 Level 16 |
EXP: 535 HP: 3000
 |
STR: 1000 END: 1000 ACC: 1000 AGI: 1000
|
Eden (Sword) (475 - 475) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zinka Otaku Knight
Gender:  Joined: 28 Sep 2004 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:03 pm Post subject: |
Okay, I don't have much time to reply to a lot so I'll make this brief which means it wont make much sense:
I think the idea of good and evil, or right and wrong, whatever you choose to call them, are definatly not something humans created.
It's intrisic to human nature wether you believe in a god or not. Think about it, iof you're waiting in line for something for a long time and someone cuts in front of you you're going to say it's unfair, wether you believe in god or not. Why is it unfair? what are you judging it on? It's not really hurting anyone or you and yet you're most likely upset about it. Maybe it goes against your idea of human decency or social moral. Where does this moral come from? The thing is, I believe everyone bleieves in right and wrong naturally, there is this idea in people that they are supposed to treat other people a certain way and this is the difference between right and wrong at its most basic level.
I don't know if I explained that well enough but asically what I'm saying is I don't believe that humans created right and wrong. It's a natural feeling, whether you believe in a god or not and no matter how you choose to explain it.
ScrumYummy wrote: |
Zinka--
I understand that there are people that don't want to leave others alone until they know that they have shown them the option, but shouldn't they give up the moment that someone has shown that they are authentically not interested? Do I really have to tell them "Thank you, but no" every time I see them?
And according to my beliefs, there is no "wrong" or "right," so I don't believe that they are "wrong," but it is very annoying to be constantly bothered by people trying to force their beliefs on you.
|
Trust me, I'd never be someone who keeps talking to someone who has already said no. But what I'm trying to say is that to these people they believe they have to keep trying. So yes, you do have to keep saying "no, thank you" everytime. I'm not trying to be rude or mean or anything when I say this, but to me, your being annoyed by them doing this means you do believe they are wrong. Because you believe its wrong for them to "bother" you when to them they are simply doing what they believe is right.
Umm...and I definatly think theres a right way and a wrong way to talk to people about god and religion and spirituality. so...I wont ever be knocking on anyone's door but once again I have to say that they don't really annoy me because I know they're just trying to do what they believe is right.
@grallick-
to me religion and spirituality are seperate ideas:
religion being the what you do, how you do it (for example, going to chruch every sunday, reading/studying the bible, serving in fellowships, etc)
spirituality being the actual relationship you have with whatever being you believe in.
basically the interior vs the exterior
I think as for a christians are concerned you've got to have a healthy balance of both or else your going to get all off course and end up hurting someone's feelings or yourself |
_________________ Terin's little sister!
check it:
whenintokyo.blogspot.com
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 28 - Losses 27 Level 8 |
EXP: 894 HP: 2425
 |
STR: 775 END: 825 ACC: 875 AGI: 725
|
Spear no Kazu (Partisan) (315 - 395) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ScrumYummy bunnyhunches of scrums

Gender:  Joined: 29 Jun 2005 |
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
Zinka wrote: | to me, your being annoyed by them doing this means you do believe they are wrong. Because you believe its wrong for them to "bother" you when to them they are simply doing what they believe is right. |
I am not annoyed at them for doing what they do, or for what they believe in. I am not annoyed because I think they are wrong and are bothering me with their beliefs; since I do not believe that there is only one "way," I do not believe they are wrong, but I am steadfast enough in my beliefs that they are not going to convince me that they are "right" (that there is only one way, and it is their way). I am annoyed because they are wasting my time, interrupting me at a variety of tasks. It is a test of my patience that they have no regard for the fact that I am not interested in their beliefs (not because I think they are wrong, but because I have my own path to follow and it is not the same as theirs).
I am fine that they believe what they do. What I am not fine with is the fact that I have expressed that I am not interested in what they are selling and yet the same people are still knocking on my door every week. It is at this point the matter has surpassed religious tolerance and has entered the domain of harassment. |
_________________ -Scrum-
..it borked. :D |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 23 - Losses 22 Level 7 |
EXP: 2313 HP: 2241
 |
STR: 779 END: 731 ACC: 795 AGI: 795
|
Totem Doll (Sword) (320 - 360) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zinka Otaku Knight
Gender:  Joined: 28 Sep 2004 |
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:25 am Post subject: |
scrum...if it really is the same people every week then yeah, thats overboard. People should know when to move on. Mostly I guess I mean the people who might try and talk to yuo about it a few times and are polite about it rather than insulting and condescending. |
_________________ Terin's little sister!
check it:
whenintokyo.blogspot.com
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 28 - Losses 27 Level 8 |
EXP: 894 HP: 2425
 |
STR: 775 END: 825 ACC: 875 AGI: 725
|
Spear no Kazu (Partisan) (315 - 395) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RivaOni Full English!

Age: 41 Gender:  Joined: 24 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 5:12 am Post subject: |
It was usually the same people with me too, or at least the same church, but they keep a record of who they believe is interested in joining their church and who isn't. |
_________________
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 27 - Losses 14 Level 8 |
EXP: 6250 HP: 2275
 |
STR: 895 END: 690 ACC: 810 AGI: 805
|
Blue Beam Saber (Sabers) (325 - 385) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|